intuitive learning

When any one of the senses are limited, the rest of them (and more than what is evident) jumps in to compensate...like an octopus and its tentacles... life and its survival kit has many tools!

word actions

Just as words in any language has come about from use and reuse and from modification over time with the need for better 'words' to express, it is the expression that matters more than words themselves. In the absence of speech/voiced expression, the closest that can convey an expression is the word, phrase, sign, symbol. Voiced expression comes with accessories of gestures, tones, stress, facial expression and others developed out of need for other methods to express. New words can be coined as long as the focus is on expression and conveyance and then communication. the measure of communication is the results produced. what shows up is a result of conversations between you to others, others to you and others to others. communication without action is mere gas, passing of memes maybe. The measure is the action and results out of actions. A nonphysical thing impacting the physical is the measure. So what needs be moved and where does it need be moved to and by when? Words which are actions. Is the future speaking through the present. Is causing multiple impacts through choice few. Is conserving and expanding in a recyclable process.

networks

Just as there are contexts within which only certain things show up, while others not, there seems to be another umbrella that has specific forms characteristic/identifiable to it. Forms of which when noticed gives an indication of that umbrella being present (?), like how specific gestures, movements, when noticed can alert to a particular space that a person may be in, eg. a furtive glance, quick noiseless movements may be indicative of something stealthy (?)...networks have objective links. Anything that refers to an objective link triggers a response system within the 'recognition system' of possible form networks...the more number of forms pertaining to a particular network, the more sure will be the 'recognition' of having zero'd onto the network and its a 'aha' moment. there could be specific words coined to identify such 'networks' but this can be seen as a concept which may have its own entelechous development..this may not be new. Brain may be designed to function only by linking forms (??) in which case the links can be chosen and worked and reworked until it gets objective and then built upon it to whatever extent. It can be broken and others formed too.


There seem to be identifiers within a network even though networks may be interconnected. Though maybe objectivized, ignoring a form is missing a chance to follow the thread into the full network, maybe in subtle but profound way connected with other networks.

Substance..

*Stuff gets trapped within words (??), which is then conveyed much like an actual physical object getting transported.*  Is there a palpability to the stuff, something that allows for it to have a kinda 'wave-particle'/real-illusion type quality, as in the substance that is the medium for creation, eg. painter has pigments, writer - strokes. Is there a thing which allows for the palable yet not real creation? ...an actor on stage deals with real palpable 'characters'. the characters are real so long as the drama or whatever is on, but that is not all, that is as real as it is an illusion. it is as real as one would want to believe. One could choose to keep the perspective of the big picture alive by remembering that it is just an act, a make believe, and then choose to participate as though it is real..and things can be moved by such participation..a drama can take a dramatic turn as long as it is consistent with the 'integrity' of that particular setup, one could also bring in something entirely new, even while being within the setup just by virtue of being able to see the big picture.. being in it and yet not in it or rather..not being in it, yet being in it.

Things I identify with..

Never been a great one with words. Have tended to invalidate everything I may want to boldly say, critisizing the point, punching it from many perspectives until I conclude it is better left untold. At least that was so until very recently, when I saw this to be a pattern of mine - of invalidating my ideas, for fear of not being approved/accepted/ridiculed or thought of being called weird. Since I kinda recognized this pattern, have taken on writing down my thoughts, with the thought of revisiting them and seeing how much of it is actually nonsense, and if at all it does have something in it that is not all nonsense. This blogspace, I found, is convenient for this purpose; kinda like the thought sieve that Prof. Dumbledore uses in Harry Potter, only here I need to type out whatever it is that I think may be something I would like to further think about.

Anyways, whats come up today, is this..
I have been on a journey of discovering what/who I am, been on it since sometime now - approximately 4.5 years now. Of course, I had to lose myself before I could go about 'finding' me, and that is an experience I am thinking of writing about sometime soon. I found of late that there are things I connect with and things I dont (nothing unique here!). When I say connect, I mean I identify with it, almost instinctively. It could be a certain note in a song, a particular way of expression, a certain mannerism, a tendency to do something, something that I sense as being very similar if not same as something about me or something that is me. This may be something that has been there all the time..'birds' of a feather' and all that, but iv become aware of this just now. It will be interesting to see how deep and wide this thought goes and how much I may have/not have become aware of as patterns in my connectivity with people/things around me.

More patterns?

Ever noticed how someone deep in thought walks slowly, head bent, not much physical motion...very much like someone carrying a heavy load would. Maybe not directly but then thoughts could be the heaviest mass in the system, considering thoughts can cause action that can move even palpable things.

Stuff are always in circulation. Anything that gets stagnant either gets stale or degenerate or is forceably displaced. What gets increased is that which has more stuff to dissipate into various pathways. Whatever has less circulability and is less touched upon, dies a natural 'death,' where death is mere redistribution of stuff or dislocation into other pathways.

inner and outer worlds

Been in the world within, know the scenery, know the sensations, know the limitations, know the workings, familiar, and unreal. Now time to pour it into another realm where the mechanism is different, just as unreal with more variables since it is the work of the projector, and the loops created through input and output adds to the variability.