Saturday, January 22, 2011

issues..

Sensitivity to ridicule, rather forms of ridicule. Sensitivity? Is it a function of 'listening for,' a function of a predecided listening for, like a tape running nonstop recording a particular frequency as a default running program, whatever immunity developed being a mere function of desensitizing certain aspects (what is this.. form??) of it. If senstivity can be developed for one thing, it can be developed for any other too, with choice, and set on default mode. The human machine is reprogammable with conscious choice. For any machine to be reprogrammable, it is essential that it be thoroughly understood, its design, functions, intricacies, delicate networks, maintenance requirements, optimum function level and req., and repair mechanisms...getting to be a motorhead? Fields of study are interconnected. Science is connected to math and philosophy - interpretative. Physical fields of study are interconnected? Construction, mechanics, actual touchable, feelable, palpable things are interconnected, other than in the conceptual sense? Basic building blocks of substances are more or less same..H, C, S, P, O, etc. (get the details..reference?). Physical things are built from limited common elements (.?). Operatability rules governing them are same? Physical forces operating them are limited and so usable interchangeably? (conceptual... no verifiability. Get facts right!). The road demands to be walked on, not talked on.

*****************
One too many fine details missing between SC and India wordscript. The number of differences and having to work inspite of them creates an ignore/overlook this node area in the assessment system (this is unique to me? A system created from one too many frictions, so a numb-zone to gloss over the friction and bring some livability than 'fight all the way' marathon?). If so, then this must be the difference why an MDA had the QA in full swing and an SC account not - too many battles and too much caution on the other end to stand up to it ? Is LPCH a causuality in the whole process? For sure integrity is dull in this aspect. The degree of lack of integrity shows up in the result. Degree of it less at my end, a little at several other ends, total impact on the actual job at hand. LPCH? How much more or how fast must the leak be dealt with (Whatever it takes,, however fast it needs to be..whatever needs tobe dealt with would be justified when the purpose is met). Even one gap in integrity filled shows up in the result. Integrity has a way of demanding the same for other sources. Authenticity begets authenticity, so does integrity. It may not be easy. No pain no gain. Too much noise. Better noise than mediocred silence. Others are too cautious about it. Tread slowly written with large invisible letters. It may just be a conversation in the head. No reality to it. No stated rule. Communication gap allowing for presumptions. Subjectivity coming from lack of clarity. There may not be a solution. There is no problem without a solution. A problem holds a gift within it. Seeking the gift is what the whole solution-seeking is about. Every problem has a solution. Demand it and the most stoic concedes to an alternative plan, as has been made evident. This is the source of resignation about the job. The number of spokes broken equals degree of unworkabiltiy equals degree of unproductivity equals degree of results overall equals sense of aliveness. It takes very less to restore integrity, much more in the will to follow it through, but very less to restore. It takes declaration and standing by it no matter what. i will be listened to as a problem causer again. Problem? solution. twins. problem-causer? solution-finder. it is boring to be an ornament or furniture, just part of something when someting worthwhile can be created in distance form and time. worth the investment of resources, time, effort, will, much more rewarding overall.

No comments:

Post a Comment